Players › WR › MIA
Should I start Malik Washington in Week 4?
Week 4, 2026 · MIA vs MIN · kickoff Sun, Oct 4, 4:05 PM ET ·
PropSims ranks Malik Washington WR12 in half-PPR for Week 4 (MIA vs MIN): start in a 12-team league. Median 10.8 points, floor 3.6 (p10), ceiling 21.1 (p85), from 10,000 simulations of the game. PPR: WR12 (median 13.4). Standard: WR14 (median 8.2).
| Scoring | Rank | Call | Median | Floor p10 | Ceiling p85 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPR | WR12 | Start | 13.4 | 4.9 | 24.8 |
| Half-PPR | WR12 | Start | 10.8 | 3.6 | 21.1 |
| Standard | WR14 | Start | 8.2 | 2.1 | 17.5 |
Game environment: MIA market-implied team total 14.2 vs 24.2 for MIN (median of 11 books via The Odds API). Usage this season (3 games): 27% target share, 3% carry share, 86% snap rate (nflverse).
Close calls: Malik Washington vs similar WRs
- Malik Washington or Josh Downs? Malik Washington outscores Josh Downs in 47% of simulated games (half-PPR).
- Malik Washington or CeeDee Lamb? Malik Washington outscores CeeDee Lamb in 47% of simulated games (half-PPR).
- Malik Washington or Dontayvion Wicks? Malik Washington outscores Dontayvion Wicks in 48% of simulated games (half-PPR).
- Malik Washington or Nico Collins? Malik Washington outscores Nico Collins in 50% of simulated games (half-PPR).
- Malik Washington or Christian Watson? Malik Washington outscores Christian Watson in 51% of simulated games (half-PPR).
- Malik Washington or Drake London? Malik Washington outscores Drake London in 52% of simulated games (half-PPR).
Ranked nearby (WR, half-PPR): CeeDee Lamb (WR10), Dontayvion Wicks (WR11), Nico Collins (WR13), Christian Watson (WR14).
Compare Malik Washington with anyone in the Start/Sit assistant →
Get PropSims free
The beta is free, no card required. Weekly projections, start/sit, DFS value and a public, pre-kickoff props log.
Numbers are PropSims own-model output from 10,000 simulations of every Week 4 game; ranks assume a 12-team league (1 QB, 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 1 FLEX). Our ranges are still slightly too narrow (76.5% of outcomes in the 10-90 range vs. 80% target). Model opinion, not advice. For entertainment and informational purposes only. 21+. Methodology · All Week 4 rankings